- android.gs
- Compare
- X70 Pro Max vs Poco M8 Power
Honor X70 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Power
What X70 Pro Max does better (12) and where Poco M8 Power wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display8.5
5.4Camera4.6
9.5Battery9.0
8.9Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
X70 Pro MaxPoco M8 Power
| X70 Pro Max | Poco M8 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 169.7 mm | −7.8 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 79.1 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 225 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X70 Pro Max better than Poco M8 Power?
- Wired charging90 W vs 45 W2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,800 nits3.3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Battery capacity8,560 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+7%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight196 g vs 225 g+15%
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 375 ppi+14%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 88.4%+3%
Why is Poco M8 Power better than X70 Pro Max?
- Memory card slotNo · X70 Pro Max: Yes
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Violet, Green, Gold | Black, Green, Blaze Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,396 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 88.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 611,651 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,328 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,560 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
