- android.gs
- Compare
- X70 Pro Max vs Aquos R11
Honor X70 Pro Max vs Sharp Aquos R11
What X70 Pro Max does better (8) and where Aquos R11 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display8.6
5.4Camera9.2
9.5Battery7.4
8.9Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
X70 Pro MaxAquos R11
| X70 Pro Max | Aquos R11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 156 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 195 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X70 Pro Max better than Aquos R11?
- Wired charging90 W vs 36 W2.5×
- Battery capacity8,560 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+68%
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 3,600 nits+67%
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 396 ppi+8%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.9 mm+14%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Aquos R11 better than X70 Pro Max?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · X70 Pro Max: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · X70 Pro Max: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.3×
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+40%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X70 Pro Max: Yes
- eSIMNo · X70 Pro Max: Yes
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 6+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 156 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Black, Violet, Green, Gold | Navy, Ivory, Terracotta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 3,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 825 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,560 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 36 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
