- android.gs
- Compare
- X6b vs Moto G Power (2025)
Honor X6b vs Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
What X6b does better (7) and where Moto G Power (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display7.0
4.1Camera8.0
7.6Battery4.8
6.8Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
X6bMoto G Power (2025)
| X6b | Moto G Power (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 166.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 208 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X6b better than Moto G Power (2025)?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Wired charging35 W vs 30 W+17%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight191 g vs 208 g+9%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.7 mm+7%
Why is Moto G Power (2025) better than X6b?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · X6b: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · X6b: Yes
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 16 MP3.2×
- Memory card slotNo · X6b: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X6b: Yes
- eSIMNo · X6b: Yes
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,000 nits+18%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Forest Green | Slate Gray, Leaf Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,388 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 993 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 87.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 440,530 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,090 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 383 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.88" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
