- android.gs
- Compare
- X6b vs Hot 60 Pro+
Honor X6b vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
What X6b does better (4) and where Hot 60 Pro+ wins (13) — every spec side by side.
6.1Display9.8
4.1Camera5.2
7.6Battery5.5
6.8Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
X6bHot 60 Pro+
| X6b | Hot 60 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 164 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.8 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 6 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 155 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X6b better than Hot 60 Pro+?
- 5GYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Hot 60 Pro+: No
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than X6b?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 4,500 nits5.3×
- OLED panelNo · X6b: Yes
- Wired charging35 W vs 45 W+29%
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 440 ppi+69%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Weight191 g vs 155 g+23%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,224 px+70%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 6 mm+35%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 155 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Forest Green | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 446,336 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,945 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 380 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.2 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | XOS 15.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
