- android.gs
- Compare
- X60 GT vs Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
Honor X60 GT vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
What X60 GT does better (4) and where Redmi Turbo 4 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.4
7.5Camera8.8
9.1Battery9.5
8.0Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X60 GTRedmi Turbo 4 Pro
| X60 GT | Redmi Turbo 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 163.1 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77.9 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 219 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X60 GT better than Redmi Turbo 4 Pro?
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
- Weight193 g vs 219 g+13%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 56%+68%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Why is Redmi Turbo 4 Pro better than X60 GT?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,300 mAh vs 7,550 mAh+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X60 GT: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.5+27%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,280 px+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Black | Black, White, Green, Harry Potter edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,292,541 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,029 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,705 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | 7,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | HyperOS 2 |
