- android.gs
- Compare
- X60 GT vs Redmi Note 15 5G
Honor X60 GT vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
What X60 GT does better (11) and where Redmi Note 15 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.0
7.5Camera8.2
9.1Battery8.1
8.0Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X60 GTRedmi Note 15 5G
| X60 GT | Redmi Note 15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 164 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.4 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 178 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X60 GT better than Redmi Note 15 5G?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Battery capacity6,300 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+14%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 405 ppi+8%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 55%+71%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
Why is Redmi Note 15 5G better than X60 GT?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Memory card slotNo · X60 GT: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X60 GT: Yes
- eSIMNo · X60 GT: Yes
- Weight193 g vs 178 g+8%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.4 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Black | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 3,286 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 91.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 830,765 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,972 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | 5,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
