- android.gs
- Compare
- X60 GT vs Pova 7 Ultra
Honor X60 GT vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What X60 GT does better (12) and where Pova 7 Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.6
7.5Camera7.8
9.1Battery9.1
8.0Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X60 GTPova 7 Ultra
| X60 GT | Pova 7 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 160 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.2 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 201 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X60 GT better than Pova 7 Ultra?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity6,300 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+5%
- Wired charging80 W vs 70 W+14%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+11%
- Weight193 g vs 201 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+16%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 83%+13%
Why is Pova 7 Ultra better than X60 GT?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wireless chargingNo · X60 GT: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X60 GT: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X60 GT: Yes
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 460 ppi+6%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+5%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,260 px+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Black | Geek White, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,771,444 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,914 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | HIOS 15 |
