- android.gs
- Compare
- X60 GT vs Narzo 80 Pro
Honor X60 GT vs Realme Narzo 80 Pro
What X60 GT does better (11) and where Narzo 80 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.7
7.5Camera7.5
9.1Battery8.9
8.0Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
X60 GTNarzo 80 Pro
| X60 GT | Narzo 80 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 162.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 179 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X60 GT better than Narzo 80 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCYes · Narzo 80 Pro: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity6,300 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+5%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+23%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 391 ppi+12%
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+11%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 71%+32%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
Why is Narzo 80 Pro better than X60 GT?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Weight193 g vs 179 g+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Black | Racing Green, Speed Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 985,745 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,923 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | Realme UI 6.0 |
