- android.gs
- Compare
- X50 vs Galaxy M54
Honor X50 vs Samsung Galaxy M54
What X50 does better (10) and where Galaxy M54 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display7.6
6.2Camera8.8
7.9Battery7.5
4.1Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50Galaxy M54
| X50 | Galaxy M54 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 164.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 199 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 better than Galaxy M54?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging35 W vs 25 W+40%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 800 nits+50%
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 393 ppi+10%
- Weight185 g vs 199 g+8%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.2% vs 85%+7%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.4 mm+5%
Why is Galaxy M54 better than X50?
- Optical stabilisationNo · X50: Yes
- NFCNo · X50: Yes
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Memory card slotNo · X50: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X50: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · X50: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver, Orange | Dark Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 85% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 756,067 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,895 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 799 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 32% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.49 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 7.1.1 | One UI 8 |
