- android.gs
- Compare
- X40 GT Racing vs Phone (2a) Plus
Honor X40 GT Racing vs Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
What X40 GT Racing does better (6) and where Phone (2a) Plus wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.0
6.1Camera8.5
5.8Battery7.7
7.9Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X40 GT RacingPhone (2a) Plus
| X40 GT Racing | Phone (2a) Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 161.7 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X40 GT Racing better than Phone (2a) Plus?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging66 W vs 50 W+32%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Charged in 30 min90% vs 71%+27%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 87.1%+2%
Why is Phone (2a) Plus better than X40 GT Racing?
- OLED panelNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Weight200 g vs 190 g+5%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 161.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Black, Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,097 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 87.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 3 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 620,762 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,234 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,377 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.6 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 50 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 90% | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI | Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
