How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Win2 vs Poco F9 Ultra

Honor Win2 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra

What Win2 does better (9) and where Poco F9 Ultra wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Honor Win2
Honor · 2026Win2
9.4Score
9 advantages≈ $790
vs
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Xiaomi · 2026Poco F9 Ultra
9.7Score
6 advantages≈ $890
Higher score
7.8Display9.7
9.3Camera9.8
9.8Battery9.8
9.3Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Win2Poco F9 Ultra
78 × 1638.577.9 × 163.58.7
Win2Poco F9 UltraDifference
Height163 mm163.5 mm−0.5 mm
Width78 mm77.9 mm+0.1 mm
Thickness8.5 mm8.7 mm−0.2 mm
Weight237 g235 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Win2 better than Poco F9 Ultra?

  1. Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 8,050 mAh+25%
  2. Pixel density497 ppi vs 416 ppi+19%
  3. CPU frequency5.01 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+9%
  4. Wireless charging power80 W vs 50 W+60%
  5. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  6. Process2 nm vs 3 nm+50%
  7. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,200 px+20%
  8. Bluetooth6.3 vs 6+5%
  9. Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.7 mm+2%

Why is Poco F9 Ultra better than Win2?

  1. Peak brightness0 nits vs 4,500 nits
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · Win2: Yes
  3. Max video4K vs 8K
  4. eSIMNo · Win2: Yes
  5. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Win2Honor Win2≈ $7909.4
Xiaomi Poco F9 UltraXiaomi Poco F9 Ultra≈ $8909.7
Design
Weight237 g235 g
Thickness8.5 mm8.7 mm
Height163 mm163.5 mm
Width78 mm77.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, White, Blue/RedBlack, Dark Cherry
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,200 px
Resolution (height)3,104 px2,608 px
Pixel density497 ppi416 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness0 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,283 nits
Screen-to-body ratio92%91.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process2 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency5.01 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 850Adreno 840
AnTuTu score—4,165,108
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—10,500
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—5×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,100 mAh8,050 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—24.6 h
Wired charging100 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—60%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power80 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.36
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound)Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 17Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 11HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—81 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare