How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Win vs nubia RedMagic 11 Pro

Honor Win vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro

What Win does better (13) and where nubia RedMagic 11 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Honor Win
Honor · 2026Win
9.7Score
13 advantages≈ $520
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $1,150
9.8Display9.6
9.7Performance9.7
9.4Camera8.9
9.8Battery9.8
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Winnubia RedMagic 11 Pro
76.6 × 163.18.376.5 × 163.88.9
Winnubia RedMagic 11 ProDifference
Height163.1 mm163.8 mm−0.7 mm
Width76.6 mm76.5 mm+0.1 mm
Thickness8.3 mm8.9 mm−0.6 mm
Weight229 g230 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Win better than nubia RedMagic 11 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,800 nits3.3×
  2. Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+33%
  3. AnTuTu score3,991,174 vs 3,229,764+24%
  4. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 11 Pro: No
  5. Refresh rate185 Hz vs 144 Hz+28%
  6. Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
  7. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  8. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 11 Pro: No
  9. Pixel density450 ppi vs 431 ppi+4%
  10. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  11. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
  12. Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.9 mm+7%

Why is nubia RedMagic 11 Pro better than Win?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Measured brightness1,142 nits vs 1,569 nits+37%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,928 vs 11,259+3%
  4. Max video4K vs 8K
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Win: Yes
  6. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  7. Charged in 30 min56% vs 71%+27%
  8. Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor WinHonor Win≈ $5209.7
Design
Weight229 g230 g
Thickness8.3 mm8.9 mm
Height163.1 mm163.8 mm
Width76.6 mm76.5 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionScratch/drop-resistant glassCorning Gorilla Glass
ColoursBlack, White, BlueMatte Black Cryo, Transparent Silver Subzero, Transparent Black Nightfreeze
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,272 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,688 px
Pixel density450 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness6,000 nits1,800 nits
Measured brightness1,142 nits1,569 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.7%90.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Adreno 840
AnTuTu score3,991,1743,229,764
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,92811,259
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—8,135
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/2f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity10,000 mAh7,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—20 h
Wired charging100 W80 W
Charged in 30 min56%71%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power80 W80 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound)Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10Redmagic OS 11
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—86 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare