- android.gs
- Compare
- Win Turbo2 vs Redmi K90 Ultra
Honor Win Turbo2 vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Ultra
What Win Turbo2 does better (7) and where Redmi K90 Ultra wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.8
9.0Camera9.0
9.6Battery9.6
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Win Turbo2Redmi K90 Ultra
| Win Turbo2 | Redmi K90 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 162.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 235 g | 227 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Win Turbo2 better than Redmi K90 Ultra?
- Battery capacity12,070 mAh vs 8,550 mAh+41%
- Refresh rate185 Hz vs 165 Hz+12%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K90 Ultra: No
- Pixel density497 ppi vs 447 ppi+11%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,280 px+12%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is Redmi K90 Ultra better than Win Turbo2?
- Peak brightness0 nits vs 9,500 nits
- Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
- CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+35%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Weight235 g vs 227 g+4%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 235 g | 227 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue/Red | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,104 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 497 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 0 nits | 9,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 90.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 3,233,695 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 10,224 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 12,070 mAh | 8,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 11 | HyperOS 3 |
