- android.gs
- Compare
- Win RT vs iQOO Z11 Turbo
Honor Win RT vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
What Win RT does better (10) and where iQOO Z11 Turbo wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.6
9.5Performance9.4
9.1Camera9.2
9.6Battery9.6
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Win RTiQOO Z11 Turbo
| Win RT | iQOO Z11 Turbo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 157.6 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.4 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 225 g | 202 g | +23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Win RT better than iQOO Z11 Turbo?
- Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 7,600 mAh+32%
- Refresh rate185 Hz vs 144 Hz+28%
- AnTuTu score3,249,469 vs 3,068,959+6%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,378 vs 9,106+3%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+14%
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 5,500 nits+9%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+4%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.7% vs 87.8%+3%
Why is iQOO Z11 Turbo better than Win RT?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Weight225 g vs 202 g+11%
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 466 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 157.6 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue | White, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 466 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 5,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 87.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 829 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,249,469 | 3,068,959 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,378 | 9,106 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 7,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | OriginOS 6 |
