- android.gs
- Compare
- Win RT vs Reno15 5G
Honor Win RT vs OPPO Reno15 5G
What Win RT does better (11) and where Reno15 5G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Win RTReno15 5G
| Win RT | Reno15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 158 mm | +5.1 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.8 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 225 g | 197 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Win RT better than Reno15 5G?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+54%
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,200 nits5×
- Refresh rate185 Hz vs 120 Hz+54%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+54%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is Reno15 5G better than Win RT?
- Telephoto cameraNo · Win RT: Yes
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- eSIMNo · Win RT: Yes
- Weight225 g vs 197 g+14%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 460 ppi+2%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.7% vs 93.4%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 158 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,256 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,760 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 93.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,249,469 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,378 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound) | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | ColorOS 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
