- android.gs
- Compare
- V Purse vs Mix Flip
Honor V Purse vs Xiaomi Mix Flip
What V Purse does better (5) and where Mix Flip wins (18) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V PurseMix Flip
| V Purse | Mix Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156.5 mm | 167.5 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 135.6 mm | 74 mm | +61.6 mm |
| Thickness | 4.3 mm | 7.6 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 190 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V Purse better than Mix Flip?
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
- Screen size7.7″ vs 6.9″+12%
- Thickness4.3 mm vs 7.6 mm+77%
- Resolution (width)2,016 px vs 1,224 px+65%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 87.5%+2%
Why is Mix Flip better than V Purse?
- Wired charging35 W vs 67 W+91%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · V Purse: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · V Purse: Yes
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 3,000 nits+88%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,780 mAh+6%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+38%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · V Purse: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 4.3 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 156.5 mm | 167.5 mm |
| Width | 135.6 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,016 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,348 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,314 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,609,570 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,035 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,209 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,780 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | — | 12 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | HyperOS 3 |
