- android.gs
- Compare
- V Purse vs Galaxy Z Fold6
Honor V Purse vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
What V Purse does better (8) and where Galaxy Z Fold6 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.3Display5.5
3.2Camera7.6
4.9Battery4.2
4.7Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
V PurseGalaxy Z Fold6
| V Purse | Galaxy Z Fold6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156.5 mm | 153.5 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 135.6 mm | 132.6 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 4.3 mm | 5.6 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 239 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V Purse better than Galaxy Z Fold6?
- Wired charging35 W vs 25 W+40%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+2%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 4 MP2×
- Weight214 g vs 239 g+12%
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 374 ppi+7%
- Thickness4.3 mm vs 5.6 mm+30%
- Resolution (width)2,016 px vs 1,856 px+9%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold6 better than V Purse?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · V Purse: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · V Purse: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · V Purse: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 2,600 nits+62%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.39 GHz+41%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · V Purse: Yes
- eSIMNo · V Purse: Yes
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 239 g |
| Thickness | 4.3 mm | 5.6 mm |
| Height | 156.5 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Width | 135.6 mm | 132.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Blue | Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink, Black, White |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.7″ | 7.6″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,016 px | 1,856 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,348 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,630 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 91% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.39 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,608,744 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,757 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,644 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 4 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.5 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.24 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold68.17.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold68.87.3
vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold67.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold66.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra7.36.9
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold68.17.3

