How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Turbo vs Poco M8 Pro

Honor Turbo vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro

What Turbo does better (6) and where Poco M8 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Honor Turbo
Honor · 2026Turbo
9.1Score
6 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro
Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8 Pro
9.0Score
11 advantages≈ $320
9.5Display9.4
6.5Performance6.8
8.1Camera7.9
9.4Battery9.1
8.4Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

TurboPoco M8 Pro
76.1 × 161.97.878.3 × 163.38.3
TurboPoco M8 ProDifference
Height161.9 mm163.3 mm−1.4 mm
Width76.1 mm78.3 mm−2.2 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8.3 mm−0.5 mm
Weight196 g206 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Turbo better than Poco M8 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity8,560 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+32%
  2. AnTuTu score1,000,207 vs 817,222+22%
  3. Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+88%
  4. Max video4K vs 1080p
  5. Weight196 g vs 206 g+5%
  6. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.3 mm+6%

Why is Poco M8 Pro better than Turbo?

  1. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,153 vs 3,245+3%
  5. Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
  6. CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+17%
  7. Pixel density427 ppi vs 447 ppi+5%
  8. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
  10. Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,280 px+7%
  11. Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor TurboHonor Turbo≈ $3509.1
Design
Weight196 g206 g
Thickness7.8 mm8.3 mm
Height161.9 mm163.3 mm
Width76.1 mm78.3 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackPlasticPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionAluminosilicate glassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursBlack, Green, BeigeBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,200 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,772 px
Pixel density427 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness6,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,435 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.9%89.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.3 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUAdreno 810Adreno 810
AnTuTu score1,000,207817,222
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,1533,245
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,110
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size—1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera16 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,560 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—16.2 h
Wired charging80 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—75%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-19.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximityFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—61 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare