- android.gs
- Compare
- Turbo vs Reno15 F
Honor Turbo vs OPPO Reno15 F
What Turbo does better (11) and where Reno15 F wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TurboReno15 F
| Turbo | Reno15 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 158.2 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74.9 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 195 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Turbo better than Reno15 F?
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,400 nits4.3×
- Battery capacity8,560 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+22%
- AnTuTu score1,000,207 vs 865,334+16%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,153 vs 2,579+22%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 397 ppi+8%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 88.6%+3%
Why is Reno15 F better than Turbo?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Memory card slotNo · Turbo: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Turbo: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass+ |
| Colours | Black, Green, Beige | Afterglow Pink, Twilight Blue, Aurora Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,372 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 397 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 88.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,000,207 | 865,334 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,153 | 2,579 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,560 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | ColorOS 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 68 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
