android.gs
Compare
Robot Phone vs Find X9 Ultra

Honor Robot Phone vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra

What Robot Phone does better (4) and where Find X9 Ultra wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2026Robot Phone

9.5Score

4 advantages≈ $1,400

OPPO · 2026Find X9 Ultra

9.7Score

11 advantages≈ $2,300

Higher score

8.4Display9.6

9.7Performance9.5

9.5Camera9.8

9.7Battery9.7

7.7Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Robot PhoneFind X9 Ultra

	Robot Phone	Find X9 Ultra	Difference
Height	190.5 mm	163.2 mm	+27.3 mm
Width	72.9 mm	77 mm	−4.1 mm
Thickness	9.6 mm	8.7 mm	+0.9 mm
Weight	248 g	235 g	+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Robot Phone better than Find X9 Ultra?

AnTuTu score4,166,339 vs 2,854,496+46%
Peak brightness6,800 nits vs 3,600 nits+89%
Wired charging120 W vs 100 W+20%
Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×

Why is Find X9 Ultra better than Robot Phone?

Optical zoom2.7× vs 10×3.7×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
eSIMNo · Robot Phone: Yes
Pixel density461 ppi vs 510 ppi+11%
Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+8%
Weight248 g vs 235 g+6%
Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
Resolution (width)1,216 px vs 1,440 px+18%
Thickness9.6 mm vs 8.7 mm+10%
Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.5+7%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor Robot Phone≈ $1,4009.5	OPPO Find X9 Ultra≈ $2,3009.7
Design
Weight	248 g	235 g
Thickness	9.6 mm	8.7 mm
Height	190.5 mm	163.2 mm
Width	72.9 mm	77 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP54	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx8
Glass protection	Giant Rhinoceros Glass	Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Silver, Gray	Tundra Umber, Canyon Orange, Polar Glacier
Display
Screen size	6.3″	6.8″
Panel	LTPO OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,216 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	3,168 px
Pixel density	461 ppi	510 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	6,800 nits	3,600 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,156 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.4%	90%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
GPU	Adreno 840	Adreno 840
AnTuTu score	4,166,339	2,854,496
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	10,703	10,895
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	7,339
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	200 MP	200 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.5
Main sensor size	1/1.28"	1/1.12"
Rear cameras	3	4
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2.7×	10×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,060 mAh	7,050 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	20.2 h
Wired charging	120 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	—	75%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16 up to 5 major OS updates
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 10	ColorOS 16
Major OS updates promised	—	5
EU label
Battery charge cycles	—	1,200
Endurance per cycle	—	75 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	B