- android.gs
- Compare
- Play 80 Pro vs Pova 8
Honor Play 80 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8
What Play 80 Pro does better (5) and where Pova 8 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display7.4
4.1Camera5.2
8.8Battery9.1
7.4Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play 80 ProPova 8
| Play 80 Pro | Pova 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 165.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 78.5 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 225 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play 80 Pro better than Pova 8?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight207 g vs 225 g+9%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.8 mm+7%
Why is Pova 8 better than Play 80 Pro?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+14%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Pixel density259 ppi vs 381 ppi+47%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Memory card slotNo · Play 80 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Azure | Arc White, Graphite Black, Helios Orange, Echo Green, Bit White (India), Terminal Green (India) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,344 px |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 381 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 991 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 86.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 666,199 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,914 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 695 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.3 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
