- android.gs
- Compare
- Play 5T Pro vs Moto G50
Honor Play 5T Pro vs Motorola Moto G50
What Play 5T Pro does better (10) and where Moto G50 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display3.8
6.1Camera4.2
2.9Battery4.0
3.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play 5T ProMoto G50
| Play 5T Pro | Moto G50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.7 mm | 164.9 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 74.9 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 192 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play 5T Pro better than Moto G50?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging22 W vs 15 W+50%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Pixel density399 ppi vs 269 ppi+48%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight179 g vs 192 g+7%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 83.2%+7%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9 mm+7%
Why is Moto G50 better than Play 5T Pro?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- 5GNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 160.7 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Magic Black, Titanium Silver | Steel Gray, Aqua Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 362 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 83.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 286,916 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,620 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 291 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer (market dependant) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 4.0 | — |
