How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic9 vs Poco F9 Pro

Honor Magic9 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro

What Magic9 does better (11) and where Poco F9 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic9
Honor · 2026Magic9
9.6Score
11 advantages≈ $710
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Xiaomi · 2026Poco F9 Pro
9.6Score
6 advantages≈ $750
8.2Display9.5
9.6Performance9.1
9.8Camera9.3
9.7Battery9.7
9.3Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic9Poco F9 Pro
72.3 × 1518.575.3 × 157.58.8
Magic9Poco F9 ProDifference
Height151 mm157.5 mm−6.5 mm
Width72.3 mm75.3 mm−3 mm
Thickness8.5 mm8.8 mm−0.3 mm
Weight209 g206 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic9 better than Poco F9 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score4,288,382 vs 2,596,938+65%
  2. Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 6,330 mAh+26%
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Optical zoom3.5× vs 2.5×+40%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,478 vs 10,198+3%
  7. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  8. Pixel density461 ppi vs 419 ppi+10%
  9. Selfie camera55 MP vs 32 MP+72%
  10. Resolution (width)1,236 px vs 1,156 px+7%
  11. Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.8 mm+4%

Why is Poco F9 Pro better than Magic9?

  1. Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits2.2×
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 185 Hz+54%
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
  4. eSIMNo · Magic9: Yes
  5. Screen size6.4″ vs 6.6″+3%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Magic9Honor Magic9≈ $7109.6
Design
Weight209 g206 g
Thickness8.5 mm8.8 mm
Height151 mm157.5 mm
Width72.3 mm75.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, White, Green, YellowBlack, White, Aurora Green
Display
Screen size6.4″6.6″
PanelOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,236 px1,156 px
Resolution (height)2,664 px2,510 px
Pixel density461 ppi419 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,270 nits
Screen-to-body ratio91.5%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Qualcomm SM8850-1-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Adreno 840
AnTuTu score4,288,3822,596,938
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,47810,198
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×2.5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera55 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity8,000 mAh6,330 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—19.1 h
Wired charging80 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—79%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth66
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 17Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 11HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—68 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare