- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic9 Super vs X300s
Honor Magic9 Super vs Vivo X300s
What Magic9 Super does better (6) and where X300s wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.5
9.7Performance9.6
9.6Camera9.6
9.7Battery9.6
9.3Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic9 SuperX300s
| Magic9 Super | X300s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 162 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 75.5 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 227 g | 217 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic9 Super better than X300s?
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 7,100 mAh+55%
- AnTuTu score4,290,399 vs 3,703,823+16%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,215 vs 10,059+11%
- CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 4.21 GHz+9%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is X300s better than Magic9 Super?
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- eSIMNo · Magic9 Super: Yes
- Weight227 g vs 217 g+5%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Reinforced Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Yellow | Black, Silver, Purple, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,788 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.4% | 91.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.6 GHz | 4.21 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Arm G1-Ultra |
| AnTuTu score | 4,290,399 | 3,703,823 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,215 | 10,059 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 7,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 11 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 5 |
