- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic9 Super vs Reno15 Pro Max
Honor Magic9 Super vs OPPO Reno15 Pro Max
What Magic9 Super does better (10) and where Reno15 Pro Max wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.0
9.7Performance8.5
9.6Camera9.7
9.7Battery9.6
9.3Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic9 SuperReno15 Pro Max
| Magic9 Super | Reno15 Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 161.3 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 227 g | 205 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic9 Super better than Reno15 Pro Max?
- AnTuTu score4,290,399 vs 2,131,6202×
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+69%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,215 vs 6,321+77%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+42%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,800 nits+11%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is Reno15 Pro Max better than Magic9 Super?
- eSIMNo · Magic9 Super: Yes
- Optical zoom3× vs 3.5×+17%
- Weight227 g vs 205 g+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.7 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 161.3 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Yellow | Dusk Brown, Aura Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,272 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,788 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.4% | 91.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.6 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu score | 4,290,399 | 2,131,620 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,215 | 6,321 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 59% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 11 | ColorOS 16 |
