- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic9 Pro Max vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Honor Magic9 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
What Magic9 Pro Max does better (8) and where Galaxy S26 Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.1
9.7Performance9.4
9.8Camera9.8
9.8Battery8.0
9.8Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic9 Pro MaxGalaxy S26 Ultra
| Magic9 Pro Max | Galaxy S26 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 163.6 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 78.1 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 233 g | 214 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic9 Pro Max better than Galaxy S26 Ultra?
- AnTuTu score5,524,187 vs 2,627,9862.1×
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+76%
- Wired charging100 W vs 60 W+67%
- Selfie camera55 MP vs 12 MP4.6×
- Wireless charging power80 W vs 25 W3.2×
- CPU frequency5.01 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+6%
- Process2 nm vs 3 nm+50%
- Bluetooth6.3 vs 6+5%
Why is Galaxy S26 Ultra better than Magic9 Pro Max?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,929 vs 11,566+16%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 2,600 nits+30%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Weight233 g vs 214 g+9%
- Pixel density464 ppi vs 500 ppi+8%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.4+14%
- Resolution (width)1,320 px vs 1,440 px+9%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 7.9 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 233 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | NanoCrystal Shield or Giant Rhinoceros Glass | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 |
| Colours | Shadow Black, Glacier Silver, Moss Green | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,320 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,868 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 500 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,480 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 90.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 2 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 5.01 GHz | 4.74 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 850 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 5,524,187 | 2,627,986 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,929 | 11,566 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,744 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4. |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.4 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 55 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.4 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 25 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.3 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 11 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 55 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.69.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsMotorola Signature9.69.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsRealme 16 Pro+9.69.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsOnePlus Nord 69.69.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsOnePlus 15T9.69.7

