- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic8 vs X200T
Honor Magic8 vs Vivo X200T
What Magic8 does better (11) and where X200T wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic8X200T
| Magic8 | X200T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.1 mm | 160 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 205 g | 203 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic8 better than X200T?
- AnTuTu score4,037,547 vs 2,725,989+48%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+13%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,014 vs 8,430+19%
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 5+40%
- CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+27%
- Wireless charging power80 W vs 40 W2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 5,000 nits+20%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is X200T better than Magic8?
- eSIMNo · Magic8: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 157.1 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Giant Rhino Glass | Schott Xensation Core |
| Colours | Black, White, Gold, Mint | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 461 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.6% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.6 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 4,037,547 | 2,725,989 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,014 | 8,430 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 5 |
