How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic8 Pro Air vs X300 Ultra

Honor Magic8 Pro Air vs Vivo X300 Ultra

What Magic8 Pro Air does better (8) and where X300 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Honor · 2026Magic8 Pro Air
9.6Score
8 advantages
vs
Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo · 2026X300 Ultra
9.7Score
13 advantages≈ $2,150
Higher score
8.3Display9.6
9.7Performance9.5
9.5Camera9.8
9.2Battery9.3
9.7Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic8 Pro AirX300 Ultra
71.9 × 150.56.176.8 × 1638.2
Magic8 Pro AirX300 UltraDifference
Height150.5 mm163 mm−12.5 mm
Width71.9 mm76.8 mm−4.9 mm
Thickness6.1 mm8.2 mm−2.1 mm
Weight155 g232 g−77 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic8 Pro Air better than X300 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score4,430,255 vs 2,723,497+63%
  2. Weight155 g vs 232 g+50%
  3. Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+33%
  4. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  5. Thickness6.1 mm vs 8.2 mm+34%
  6. Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
  8. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is X300 Ultra better than Magic8 Pro Air?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  2. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+20%
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  5. Optical zoom3.2× vs 4.7×+47%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,603 vs 11,494+8%
  7. Max video4K vs 8K
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  9. Pixel density461 ppi vs 510 ppi+11%
  10. CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+9%
  11. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+8%
  12. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X300 UltraVivo X300 Ultra≈ $2,1509.7
Design
Weight155 g232 g
Thickness6.1 mm8.2 mm
Height150.5 mm163 mm
Width71.9 mm76.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Armor glass
ColoursBlack, White, Purple, OrangeEclipse Black, Victory Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.3″6.8″
PanelLTPO OLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,216 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px3,168 px
Pixel density461 ppi510 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness6,000 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,935 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.2%90.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9500Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.21 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUArm G1-UltraAdreno 840
AnTuTu score4,430,2552,723,497
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,60311,494
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,075
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.12"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.2×4.7×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh6,600 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—15.8 h
Wired charging80 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—66%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W40 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10OriginOS 6
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—57 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare