android.gs
Compare
Magic7 vs 14 Ultra

Honor Magic7 vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra

What Magic7 does better (10) and where 14 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2024Magic7

9.5Score

10 advantages≈ $630

Higher score

Xiaomi · 202414 Ultra

9.3Score

9 advantages≈ $710

9.2Display8.9

9.4Performance8.8

8.6Camera9.8

9.6Battery6.8

9.3Features9.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic714 Ultra

	Magic7	14 Ultra	Difference
Height	162.1 mm	161.4 mm	+0.7 mm
Width	75.8 mm	75.3 mm	+0.5 mm
Thickness	8 mm	9.2 mm	−1.2 mm
Weight	199 g	230 g	−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic7 better than 14 Ultra?

AnTuTu score2,967,184 vs 2,014,262+47%
Battery capacity5,650 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+13%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,598 vs 7,060+36%
Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+67%
Wired charging100 W vs 90 W+11%
CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+31%
Weight199 g vs 230 g+15%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
Thickness8 mm vs 9.2 mm+15%

Why is 14 Ultra better than Magic7?

Optical stabilisationNo · Magic7: Yes
Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Pixel density453 ppi vs 522 ppi+15%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,440 px+14%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor Magic7≈ $6309.5	Xiaomi 14 Ultra≈ $7109.3
Design
Weight	199 g	230 g
Thickness	8 mm	9.2 mm
Height	162.1 mm	161.4 mm
Width	75.8 mm	75.3 mm
Frame	—	Titanium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Giant rhino glass	Xiaomi Shield Glass
Colours	Black, White, Gray, Blue, Gold	Black, Blue, White, Titanium Gray
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	LTPO OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,264 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,800 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	453 ppi	522 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	5,000 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,281 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.5%	89.6%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.32 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 830	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	2,967,184	2,014,262
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	9,598	7,060
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,977
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.3"	1"
Rear cameras	3	4
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,650 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.4 h
Wired charging	100 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	91%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	80 W	80 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Satellite messaging	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	1 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	4