android.gs
Compare
Magic7 Lite vs iQOO Neo 10R

Honor Magic7 Lite vs Vivo iQOO Neo 10R

What Magic7 Lite does better (7) and where iQOO Neo 10R wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2025Magic7 Lite

8.8Score

7 advantages≈ $290

Vivo · 2025iQOO Neo 10R

9.2Score

14 advantages≈ $310

Higher score

9.6Display9.7

5.5Performance8.1

8.5Camera8.9

8.5Battery9.1

7.7Features6.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic7 LiteiQOO Neo 10R

	Magic7 Lite	iQOO Neo 10R	Difference
Height	162.8 mm	163.7 mm	−0.9 mm
Width	75.5 mm	75.9 mm	−0.4 mm
Thickness	8 mm	8 mm	=
Weight	189 g	196 g	−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic7 Lite better than iQOO Neo 10R?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
NFCYes · iQOO Neo 10R: No
Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 6,400 mAh+3%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
eSIMYes · iQOO Neo 10R: No
Weight189 g vs 196 g+4%

Why is iQOO Neo 10R better than Magic7 Lite?

AnTuTu score594,450 vs 1,790,2893×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,705 vs 4,598+70%
Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
4K selfie videoNo · Magic7 Lite: Yes
Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+12%
Pixel density437 ppi vs 452 ppi+3%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor Magic7 Lite≈ $2908.8	Vivo iQOO Neo 10R≈ $3109.2
Design
Weight	189 g	196 g
Thickness	8 mm	8 mm
Height	162.8 mm	163.7 mm
Width	75.5 mm	75.9 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP64	IP65
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx5
Glass protection	—	Schott Xensation Up
Colours	Titanium Purple, Titanium Black	Raging Blue, MoonKnight Titanium
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,700 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	437 ppi	452 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	4,000 nits	4,500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.7%	89.7%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Adreno 735
AnTuTu score	594,450	1,790,289
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,705	4,598
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	617	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.67"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,600 mAh	6,400 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	15 h	—
Wired charging	66 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	—	58%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.1	5.4
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic)	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 8	Funtouch 15
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	60 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	A	—