How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic4 Pro vs Galaxy S22 Ultra

Honor Magic4 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

What Magic4 Pro does better (7) and where Galaxy S22 Ultra wins (17) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic4 Pro
Honor · 2022Magic4 Pro
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ $500
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Samsung · 2022Galaxy S22 Ultra
9.3Score
17 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
8.2Display9.2
7.3Performance7.9
8.6Camera9.8
8.1Battery7.1
9.5Features9.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic4 ProGalaxy S22 Ultra
74.7 × 163.69.177.9 × 163.38.9
Magic4 ProGalaxy S22 UltraDifference
Height163.6 mm163.3 mm+0.3 mm
Width74.7 mm77.9 mm−3.2 mm
Thickness9.1 mm8.9 mm+0.2 mm
Weight209 g229 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic4 Pro better than Galaxy S22 Ultra?

  1. Wired charging100 W vs 45 W2.2×
  2. Wireless charging power100 W vs 15 W6.7×
  3. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Weight209 g vs 229 g+10%
  5. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+7%
  6. Charged in 30 min100% vs 60%+67%
  7. Screen-to-body ratio93% vs 89.8%+4%

Why is Galaxy S22 Ultra better than Magic4 Pro?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
  2. AnTuTu score980,755 vs 1,434,169+46%
  3. Optical zoom3.5× vs 10×2.9×
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  5. Optical stabilisationNo · Magic4 Pro: Yes
  6. Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
  7. Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,750 nits+75%
  8. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,512 vs 4,351+24%
  9. Selfie camera12 MP vs 40 MP3.3×
  10. Measured brightness957 nits vs 1,253 nits+31%
  11. Max video4K vs 8K
  12. Pixel density460 ppi vs 500 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Magic4 ProHonor Magic4 Pro≈ $5009.0
Design
Weight209 g229 g
Thickness9.1 mm8.9 mm
Height163.6 mm163.3 mm
Width74.7 mm77.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionAluminosilicate glassGorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlack, White, Cyan, Gold, OrangeWhite, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Red
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO OLEDDynamic Amoled 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,312 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,848 px3,080 px
Pixel density460 ppi500 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits1,750 nits
Measured brightness957 nits1,253 nits
Screen-to-body ratio93%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Samsung Exynos 2200
Chip makerQualcommSamsung
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz2.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Xclipse 920
AnTuTu score980,7551,434,169
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,5124,351
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,967
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP108 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.33"
Rear cameras34
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×10×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera12 MP40 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,600 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging100 W45 W
Charged in 30 min100%60%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power100 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C
USB version3.13.2
Video outputYesYes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.6 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
3D face unlockYes—
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassproximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, hall, fingerprint
SAR (head)—1.05 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagic UI 6.0One UI 4.1
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare