android.gs
Compare
Magic V6 vs 18 Fold

Honor Magic V6 vs Xiaomi 18 Fold

What Magic V6 does better (13) and where 18 Fold wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2026Magic V6

9.6Score

13 advantages≈ $1,750

Higher score

Xiaomi · 202618 Fold

9.5Score

6 advantages≈ $1,500

8.9Display7.7

9.6Performance9.8

7.8Camera9.2

9.8Battery9.4

9.6Features7.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V618 Fold

	Magic V6	18 Fold	Difference
Height	156.7 mm	163.8 mm	−7.1 mm
Width	145.6 mm	117.8 mm	+27.8 mm
Thickness	4 mm	5 mm	−1 mm
Weight	219 g	219 g	=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V6 better than 18 Fold?

Battery capacity6,660 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+11%
Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 4,000 nits+25%
4K selfie videoYes · 18 Fold: No
eSIMYes · 18 Fold: No
CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 4.35 GHz+6%
Pixel density403 ppi vs 382 ppi+5%
Screen size8″ vs 7.6″+5%
Wireless charging power66 W vs 50 W+32%
Resolution (width)2,172 px vs 1,672 px+30%
Thickness4 mm vs 5 mm+25%
Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%

Why is 18 Fold better than Magic V6?

Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
AnTuTu score3,080,707 vs 5,228,014+70%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,871 vs 13,491+37%
Max video4K vs 8K
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor Magic V6≈ $1,7509.6	Xiaomi 18 Fold≈ $1,5009.5
Design
Weight	219 g	219 g
Thickness	4 mm	5 mm
Height	156.7 mm	163.8 mm
Width	145.6 mm	117.8 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP58
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Honor Super Armored Inner Screen	Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3
Colours	Gold, Red, White, Black	Gray, Silver, Red, Rose gold
Stylus	Yes	—
Display
Screen size	8″	7.6″
Panel	Foldable LTPO2 AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	2,172 px	1,672 px
Resolution (height)	2,352 px	2,364 px
Pixel density	403 ppi	382 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	5,000 nits	4,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,222 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.1%	90.6%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	XRing O3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Xring
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	4.6 GHz	4.35 GHz
GPU	Adreno 840	Arm G2-Ultra NX MC16
AnTuTu score	3,080,707	5,228,014
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	9,871	13,491
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	6,702	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	200 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	3×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	20 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,660 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	15.3 h	—
Wired charging	80 W	67 W
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	66 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Ultra Wideband	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 17
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 10	HyperOS 4
Major OS updates promised	7	—

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsXiaomi 18 Fold8.89.5