How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design vs Razr Fold

Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design vs Motorola Razr Fold

What Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design does better (2) and where Razr Fold wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design
7.9Score
2 advantages≈ $2,900
vs
Motorola Razr Fold
Motorola · 2026Razr Fold
9.7Score
15 advantages≈ $2,250
Higher score
5.2Display9.5
6.6Camera9.1
7.5Battery9.7
9.0Features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V2 RSR Porsche DesignRazr Fold
145.4 × 156.74.7144.5 × 160.14.7
Magic V2 RSR Porsche DesignRazr FoldDifference
Height156.7 mm160.1 mm−3.4 mm
Width145.4 mm144.5 mm+0.9 mm
Thickness4.7 mm4.7 mm=
Weight234 g243 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design better than Razr Fold?

  1. Storage (base)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  2. Weight234 g vs 243 g+4%

Why is Razr Fold better than Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design?

  1. Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 6,200 nits3.9×
  2. Wireless chargingNo · Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design: Yes
  3. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
  4. Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
  5. Max video4K vs 8K
  6. Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
  7. Optical zoom2.5× vs 3×+20%
  8. CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+13%
  9. Screen size7.9″ vs 8.1″+2%
  10. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
  12. Bluetooth5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr FoldMotorola Razr Fold≈ $2,2509.7
Design
Weight234 g243 g
Thickness4.7 mm4.7 mm
Height156.7 mm160.1 mm
Width145.4 mm144.5 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassSilicone polymer
Ingress protection—IP48
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass-Keramik
ColoursAgate GrayPantone: Blackened Blue, Lily White
StylusYesYes
Display
Screen size7.9″8.1″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO P-OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,156 px2,232 px
Resolution (height)2,344 px2,484 px
Pixel density402 ppi410 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits6,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,510 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.5%91.9%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.36 GHz3.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 829
AnTuTu score—2,342,132
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,804
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,152
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size—1/1.28"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom2.5×3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—16.1 h
Wired charging66 W80 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.36
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video output—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-28.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 8—
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—59 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare