How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic V Flip vs Razr 60 Ultra

Honor Magic V Flip vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

What Magic V Flip does better (4) and where Razr 60 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic V Flip
Honor · 2024Magic V Flip
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ $690
vs
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra
9.1Score
13 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
5.9Display9.6
6.3Camera6.6
7.1Battery8.4
4.7Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V FlipRazr 60 Ultra
75.6 × 167.37.274 × 171.57.2
Magic V FlipRazr 60 UltraDifference
Height167.3 mm171.5 mm−4.2 mm
Width75.6 mm74 mm+1.6 mm
Thickness7.2 mm7.2 mm=
Weight193 g199 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V Flip better than Razr 60 Ultra?

  1. Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+2%
  2. Weight193 g vs 199 g+3%
  3. Wireless charging power40 W vs 30 W+33%
  4. Charged in 30 min90% vs 78%+15%

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Magic V Flip?

  1. Wireless chargingNo · Magic V Flip: Yes
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
  3. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
  4. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+44%
  5. Wired charging66 W vs 68 W+3%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. eSIMNo · Magic V Flip: Yes
  8. Pixel density403 ppi vs 464 ppi+15%
  9. Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
  10. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  12. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight193 g199 g
Thickness7.2 mm7.2 mm
Height167.3 mm171.5 mm
Width75.6 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Silicone polymer
Ingress protection—IP48
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass-Keramik
ColoursBlack, White, Champagne, GreenPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret
Display
Screen size6.8″7″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,520 px2,912 px
Pixel density403 ppi464 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,489 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.4%84.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 830
AnTuTu score—1,831,189
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,796
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,938
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.56"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom—2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate—120 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,800 mAh4,700 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—15.2 h
Wired charging66 W68 W
Charged in 30 min90%78%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power40 W30 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version22
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 8Hello UI
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—49 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare