How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic V Flip 2 vs X Fold6

Honor Magic V Flip 2 vs Vivo X Fold6

What Magic V Flip 2 does better (7) and where X Fold6 wins (17) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic V Flip 2
Honor · 2025Magic V Flip 2
8.9Score
7 advantages
vs
Vivo X Fold6
Vivo · 2026X Fold6
9.4Score
17 advantages≈ $2,250
Higher score
8.8Display8.5
7.9Performance7.7
7.4Camera9.5
8.9Battery9.6
5.4Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V Flip 2X Fold6
75.6 × 167.16.9145.7 × 157.24.4
Magic V Flip 2X Fold6Difference
Height167.1 mm157.2 mm+9.9 mm
Width75.6 mm145.7 mm−70.1 mm
Thickness6.9 mm4.4 mm+2.5 mm
Weight204 g228 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V Flip 2 better than X Fold6?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,650 vs 3,390+37%
  2. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  3. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold6: No
  4. Measured brightness1,786 nits vs 1,516 nits+18%
  5. Weight204 g vs 228 g+12%
  6. Pixel density458 ppi vs 424 ppi+8%
  7. Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%

Why is X Fold6 better than Magic V Flip 2?

  1. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,900 mAh+25%
  2. AnTuTu score2,270,288 vs 2,751,330+21%
  3. Telephoto cameraNo · Magic V Flip 2: Yes
  4. Active use (test)12.7 h vs 14.8 h+17%
  5. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 4.21 GHz+28%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. eSIMNo · Magic V Flip 2: Yes
  8. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,262 vs 5,090+19%
  9. Screen size6.8″ vs 8″+18%
  10. Resolution (width)1,232 px vs 2,312 px+88%
  11. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  12. Thickness6.9 mm vs 4.4 mm+57%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X Fold6Vivo X Fold6≈ $2,2509.4
Design
Weight204 g228 g
Thickness6.9 mm4.4 mm
Height167.1 mm157.2 mm
Width75.6 mm145.7 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP58IP58
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursPurple, Silver, Gray, BlueNebula Teal, Prism Black, White
Display
Screen size6.8″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,232 px2,312 px
Resolution (height)2,868 px2,504 px
Pixel density458 ppi424 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,786 nits1,516 nits
Screen-to-body ratio86.1%90.7%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9500 Super
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz4.21 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
AnTuTu score2,270,2882,751,330
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,6503,390
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,2625,090
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.4"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh6,900 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)12.7 h14.8 h
Wired charging80 W80 W
Charged in 30 min71%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W40 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version23.2
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS-25.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.93 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 9OriginOS 7 Fold (INT) Android 16
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—59 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare