- android.gs
- Compare
- GT vs iQOO Z9 Turbo+
Honor GT vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
What GT does better (6) and where iQOO Z9 Turbo+ wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.7
8.9Performance9.0
8.6Camera8.6
8.7Battery9.1
8.3Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
GTiQOO Z9 Turbo+
| GT | iQOO Z9 Turbo+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.9 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 196 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT better than iQOO Z9 Turbo+?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 65%+85%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,676 vs 4,546+3%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Why is iQOO Z9 Turbo+ better than GT?
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 6,400 mAh+21%
- AnTuTu score2,341,391 vs 2,401,319+3%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,202 vs 7,526+4%
- Memory card slotNo · GT: Yes
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+12%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 453 ppi+4%
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+3%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,260 px+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Black, White, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,341,391 | 2,401,319 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,202 | 7,526 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,676 | 4,546 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 6,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | OriginOS 4 |
