- android.gs
- Compare
- GT vs iQOO Neo9S Pro
Honor GT vs Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro
What GT does better (4) and where iQOO Neo9S Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
9.1Display9.2
8.9Performance9.0
8.6Camera8.9
8.7Battery8.6
8.3Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
GTiQOO Neo9S Pro
| GT | iQOO Neo9S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 163.5 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.7 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 190 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT better than iQOO Neo9S Pro?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,400 nits2.9×
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro better than GT?
- AnTuTu score2,341,391 vs 2,439,634+4%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,202 vs 7,578+5%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,676 vs 5,141+10%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 453 ppi+4%
- Weight196 g vs 190 g+3%
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+3%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 133%+11%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,260 px+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Black, White, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,341,391 | 2,439,634 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,202 | 7,578 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,676 | 5,141 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 133% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | OriginOS 4 |
