android.gs
Compare
GT vs Galaxy S24 FE

Honor GT vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

What GT does better (18) and where Galaxy S24 FE wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2024GT

9.3Score

18 advantages≈ $310

Higher score

Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24 FE

8.8Score

11 advantages≈ $300

9.1Display8.1

8.9Performance7.8

8.6Camera9.3

8.7Battery3.8

8.3Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

GTGalaxy S24 FE

	GT	Galaxy S24 FE	Difference
Height	161 mm	162 mm	−1 mm
Width	74.2 mm	77.3 mm	−3.1 mm
Thickness	7.7 mm	8 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	196 g	213 g	−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT better than Galaxy S24 FE?

Wired charging100 W vs 25 W4×
RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
AnTuTu score2,341,391 vs 1,548,896+51%
Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,900 nits2.1×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+13%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,202 vs 6,299+14%
Charged in 30 min120% vs 50%2.4×
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,676 vs 3,889+20%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Pixel density436 ppi vs 385 ppi+13%
Weight196 g vs 213 g+9%

Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than GT?

Telephoto cameraNo · GT: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · GT: Yes
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
4K selfie videoNo · GT: Yes
eSIMNo · GT: Yes
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor GT≈ $3109.3	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE≈ $3008.8
Design
Weight	196 g	213 g
Thickness	7.7 mm	8 mm
Height	161 mm	162 mm
Width	74.2 mm	77.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP65	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black, White, Green	Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,200 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,664 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	436 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,000 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,372 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.8%	88%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Exynos 2400e
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Exynos
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.1 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	2,341,391	1,548,896
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	7,202	6,299
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,676	3,889
Memory
RAM	16 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/2	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,300 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.8 h
Wired charging	100 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	120%	50%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	42 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A