- android.gs
- Compare
- GT vs Moto S50
Honor GT vs Motorola Moto S50
What GT does better (11) and where Moto S50 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GTMoto S50
| GT | Moto S50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 154.1 mm | +6.9 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 71.2 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 170 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT better than Moto S50?
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 4,310 mAh+23%
- Wired charging100 W vs 68 W+47%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+33%
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+32%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.1 mm+5%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 115%+4%
Why is Moto S50 better than GT?
- Telephoto cameraNo · GT: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · GT: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · GT: Yes
- Weight196 g vs 170 g+15%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 460 ppi+6%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,272 px+6%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.8% vs 94.4%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 170 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 154.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 71.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Nautical Blue, Latte, Poinciana |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO P-OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,272 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,670 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 94.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,341,391 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,202 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,676 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.5" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 4,310 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 115% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | — |
