- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Pro vs 13T
Honor GT Pro vs OnePlus 13T
What GT Pro does better (13) and where 13T wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Pro13T
| GT Pro | 13T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 150.8 mm | +11.3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 71.7 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 185 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Pro better than 13T?
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,600 nits3.8×
- Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 6,260 mAh+15%
- AnTuTu score3,280,245 vs 3,173,674+3%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · 13T: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · 13T: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.3″+7%
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+3%
Why is 13T better than GT Pro?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,000 vs 9,307+3%
- eSIMNo · GT Pro: Yes
- Weight212 g vs 185 g+15%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.9% vs 90.6%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 150.8 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 71.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Giant rhino glass | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Gold | Black, Gray, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 90.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,280,245 | 3,173,674 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,000 | 9,307 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,200 mAh | 6,260 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | OxygenOS 15 (International) |
