- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 vs Zero 30
Honor 90 vs Infinix Zero 30
What 90 does better (9) and where Zero 30 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
90Zero 30
| 90 | Zero 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.5 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 185 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 better than Zero 30?
- Main camera200 MP vs 108 MP+85%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 950 nits+68%
- Measured brightness1,176 nits vs 764 nits+54%
- eSIMYes · Zero 30: No
- Pixel density435 ppi vs 388 ppi+12%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
Why is Zero 30 better than 90?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 90: Yes
- AnTuTu score575,122 vs 635,016+10%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging66 W vs 68 W+3%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Charged in 30 min69% vs 80%+16%
- Loudspeaker loudness-29.9 LUFS vs -26.6 LUFS+-11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 435 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,176 nits | 764 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 575,122 | 635,016 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,011 | 2,952 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 857 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 10.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 69% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.9 LUFS | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | XOS 13 |
