- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 GT vs 13T Pro
Honor 90 GT vs Xiaomi 13T Pro
What 90 GT does better (6) and where 13T Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 GT13T Pro
| 90 GT | 13T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 162.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.7 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 200 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 GT better than 13T Pro?
- AnTuTu score1,634,078 vs 1,214,085+35%
- RAM24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,064 vs 4,859+4%
- Weight185 g vs 200 g+8%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.5 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.8% vs 87.5%+4%
Why is 13T Pro better than 90 GT?
- Telephoto cameraNo · 90 GT: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMNo · 90 GT: Yes
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+5%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 158%+68%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 446 ppi+2%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Gold | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,094 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,634,078 | 1,214,085 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,064 | 4,859 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 158% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
