- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 GT vs Ace 3
Honor 90 GT vs OnePlus Ace 3
What 90 GT does better (3) and where Ace 3 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 GTAce 3
| 90 GT | Ace 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 163.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.3 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 207 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 GT better than Ace 3?
- RAM24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- Weight185 g vs 207 g+12%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.8 mm+11%
Why is Ace 3 better than 90 GT?
- AnTuTu score1,634,078 vs 1,907,512+17%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 4,500 nits+73%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 450 ppi+3%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 111%+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,264 px+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 207 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Gold | Black, Blue, Rose Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,264 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,780 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,634,078 | 1,907,512 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,064 | 4,986 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,648 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 111% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | ColorOS 14 |
