- android.gs
- Compare
- 80 vs iQOO 9 SE
Honor 80 vs Vivo iQOO 9 SE
What 80 does better (10) and where iQOO 9 SE wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
80iQOO 9 SE
| 80 | iQOO 9 SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.2 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 199 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 80 better than iQOO 9 SE?
- Main camera160 MP vs 48 MP3.3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 398 ppi+12%
- Weight180 g vs 199 g+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.4 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.7% vs 84.9%+7%
Why is iQOO 9 SE better than 80?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 80: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · 80: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,200 nits+20%
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+5%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 107%+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Glass protection | — | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Black, Green, Blue, Pink | Space Fusion, Sunset Sierra |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 863 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 727,771 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,442 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 160 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 107% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | Funtouch 12 |
