- android.gs
- Compare
- 70 vs Poco M5s
Honor 70 vs Xiaomi Poco M5s
What 70 does better (18) and where Poco M5s wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
70Poco M5s
| 70 | Poco M5s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 160.5 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 74.5 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 179 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 70 better than Poco M5s?
- AnTuTu score765,434 vs 360,6812.1×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Wired charging66 W vs 33 W2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,025 vs 1,831+65%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Poco M5s: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+22%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Measured brightness790 nits vs 756 nits+4%
Why is Poco M5s better than 70?
- Stereo speakersNo · 70: Yes
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Main camera54 MP vs 64 MP+19%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,100 nits+38%
- Memory card slotNo · 70: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 70: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
- Loudspeaker loudness-29.4 LUFS vs -25.4 LUFS+-14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal Silver | Gray, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 790 nits | 756 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 83.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 765,434 | 360,681 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,025 | 1,831 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 421 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 54 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 90% | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.4 LUFS | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 8 | MIUI 13 |
