- android.gs
- Compare
- 70 Pro vs iQOO 9
Honor 70 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 9
What 70 Pro does better (14) and where iQOO 9 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
70 ProiQOO 9
| 70 Pro | iQOO 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 159.1 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 200 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 70 Pro better than iQOO 9?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,350 mAh+3%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Main camera54 MP vs 48 MP+12%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO 9: No
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 398 ppi+8%
- Weight192 g vs 200 g+4%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
Why is iQOO 9 better than 70 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 70 Pro: Yes
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 250%2.1×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 2.99 GHz+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 159.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Black, Green, Gold, Silver | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 749 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.75 GHz | 2.99 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 745,168 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,503 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 54 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 250% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | Funtouch 12 |
