- android.gs
- Compare
- 70 Pro vs Moto X40
Honor 70 Pro vs Motorola Moto X40
What 70 Pro does better (7) and where Moto X40 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
70 ProMoto X40
| 70 Pro | Moto X40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 161.2 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 70 Pro better than Moto X40?
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Main camera54 MP vs 50 MP+8%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 393 ppi+9%
- Weight192 g vs 199 g+4%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.6 mm+5%
Why is Moto X40 better than 70 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 70 Pro: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · 70 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- Wired charging100 W vs 125 W+25%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+2%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+16%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 214%+78%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 60 MP+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 161.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Green, Gold, Silver | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 90.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.75 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 740 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 54 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 60 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 125 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 214% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | — |
