- android.gs
- Compare
- 70 Pro+ vs Galaxy A73 5G
Honor 70 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
What 70 Pro+ does better (13) and where Galaxy A73 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display7.4
8.3Camera8.8
6.4Battery5.3
8.7Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
70 Pro+Galaxy A73 5G
| 70 Pro+ | Galaxy A73 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.1 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 181 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 70 Pro+ better than Galaxy A73 5G?
- Wired charging100 W vs 25 W4×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A73 5G: No
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 45%2.7×
- CPU frequency3.05 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+27%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 393 ppi+9%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.1% vs 87%+5%
Why is Galaxy A73 5G better than 70 Pro+?
- Main camera54 MP vs 108 MP2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 70 Pro+: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Memory card slotNo · 70 Pro+: Yes
- Weight192 g vs 181 g+6%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Green, Gold | Gray, Mint, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 87% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 737,242 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,829 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 686 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 54 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
