- android.gs
- Compare
- 600e vs Camon 50 Pro 4G
Honor 600e vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
What 600e does better (7) and where Camon 50 Pro 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.7
7.1Camera9.0
8.6Battery8.6
7.5Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
600eCamon 50 Pro 4G
| 600e | Camon 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.4 mm | 162.4 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 171 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 600e better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Camon 50 Pro 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,520 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+6%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than 600e?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 600e: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · 600e: Yes
- Wired charging45 W vs 60 W+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Memory card slotNo · 600e: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Weight180 g vs 171 g+5%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 171 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 157.4 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Unspecified |
| Colours | Velvet Gray, Desert Gold, Vital Green | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,600 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 434 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 89.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 Elite | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 569,394 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,520 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
