How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. 600 vs X300 FE (Russia)

Honor 600 vs Vivo X300 FE (Russia)

What 600 does better (8) and where X300 FE (Russia) wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Honor 600
Honor · 2026600
9.4Score
8 advantages≈ $640
vs
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
Vivo · 2026X300 FE (Russia)
9.4Score
9 advantages≈ $700
Higher score
9.1Display8.3
9.0Camera9.4
9.3Battery9.5
9.8Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

600X300 FE (Russia)
74.7 × 1567.871.8 × 150.88
600X300 FE (Russia)Difference
Height156 mm150.8 mm+5.2 mm
Width74.7 mm71.8 mm+2.9 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8 mm−0.2 mm
Weight185 g191 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 600 better than X300 FE (Russia)?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
  3. Peak brightness8,000 nits vs 5,000 nits+60%
  4. Major OS updates promised6 vs 5+20%
  5. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.3″+4%
  6. Weight185 g vs 191 g+3%
  7. Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,216 px+4%
  8. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%

Why is X300 FE (Russia) better than 600?

  1. Telephoto cameraNo · 600: Yes
  2. Wireless chargingNo · 600: Yes
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  4. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+36%
  5. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  6. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  7. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
  9. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 600Honor 600≈ $6409.4
Design
Weight185 g191 g
Thickness7.8 mm8 mm
Height156 mm150.8 mm
Width74.7 mm71.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursGolden White, Black, OrangeMoonlight White, Cool Purple, Graphite Black
Display
Screen size6.6″6.3″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,264 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,728 px2,640 px
Pixel density458 ppi461 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness8,000 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness1,749 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio91.2%90.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 722Adreno 829
AnTuTu score1,087,148—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,090—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,797—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,000 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)17 h—
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min71%—
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (ultrasound), compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised65
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle67 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare